Remembering those who served
Perspicacity Press: Fostering Freedom by Bringing Clarity, Acuity and Veracity to Vital Issues and Events
HOME  |  ABOUT US  |  SPEAKERS BUREAU  |  CONTACT US  |  ARCHIVES / INDEX  |  Facebook logo "LIKE" or COMMENT

 Rand's Rants & Raves  October 22, 2011


Using "budget cuts" as an excuse for letting
criminals go loose is reckless endangerment

 
Rand Green 
Yosemite Valley
 

Topical
Index


 

Car burglaryNOT ALL of the criminals in the United States who should be behind bars are. Some are released from prison or from jail because of so-called "prison overcrowding," and some on the pretense that "budget cuts" make it necessary. And oftentimes, those who are released go right back out and commit more crimes, ranging from theft and burglary to rape and murder.

In Fresno, California, which has the dubious honor of being the car theft capital of the world, the police have been working hard to identify, capture, put out of business and bring to justice the career criminals responsible for most of the car thefts, and they have been having considerable success. With the arrest Thursday, Oct. 20, of a man who admits to being responsible for more than 1,000 vehicle thefts in the Fresno area, three of the top five "most wanted" car thieves on the police department's list are now "behind bars," according to the Fresno Bee.

"But there is no guarantee he will stay there for long," the Bee reported Oct. 22. "Because of county budget cuts, Sheriff Margaret Mims has opted to close jail floors, which reduces the jail's capacity. When the number of inmates hits capacity, the jail must begin releasing inmates." And in fact, "early releases may begin once the capacity hits 90 percent," the Bee story said.

I do not believe that either prison overcrowding or budget cuts are a justification for letting these high-risk criminals back on the streets. Certainly governments at all levels local, state and federal need to reduce spending, but discretion needs to be exercised on where those cuts are made.

The biggest problem is that way too much money is being spent on programs in which government shouldn't be involved in the first place. Those programs should be eliminated even if there were no budget restraints.

There are other programs that are nice to have when times are good but should be cut first when money gets tight, just as you would do with your own family budget.

Then there are the high-priority services that are the first responsibility of governments. At the federal level, that include national security. At the local level, it includes public safety. Adequate funding for those responsibilities should never be sacrificed just to keep other less vital program running.

It is irresponsible for any government or government agency to make "across-the-board cuts" just out of a sense of fairness to all. Rather, cuts should be prioritized.

In point of fact, they often are prioritized, but not based on the right priorities. Even worse than indiscriminate across-the-board cuts is the widespread practice of city councils, county boards of supervisors and government agencies of all stripes to deliberately make the cuts where they will hurt the worst, where they will make the general public most upset.

Why would they do that? Purely and simply in the hope that the outrage will translate into public support for higher taxes. But the answer is not higher taxes. It is more responsible use of tax dollars.

When city, county or state officials use budget cuts as an excuse for releasing criminals onto the streets who ought to be behind bars, rather than taking a sharper knife to other programs that could have been cut without affecting public safety, those who make such decisions are knowingly and deliberately putting the lives and property of the residents of that city, county or state at risk. That, it seems to me, clearly constitutes reckless endangerment on the part of the officials making those decisions. Perspicaciously Yours, Rand Green, Editor/Publisher, PerspicacityPress.com
Source: www.PerspicacityPress.com  2011 Rand Green Communications.

Source: www.PerspicacityPress.com. Copyright 2011 Rand Green Communications.
Do not repost without written permission (usually granted on request) or without this notice. Do not extract quotes without proper credit. Plagiarism is a crime. You may link to this page. You may also print copies of the entire page, including the Perspicacity Press banner and this notice, for your own reference and in limited quantities for free distribution to your friends and colleagues.

Facebook Logo Click HERE to comment on this article on Facebook.






(The following ads are furnished by Google. Perspicacity Press does not select and does not necessarily endorse these ads.)



 
CONTACT US  |  TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE  |  PRIVACY POLICY  |  SITE MAP

Perspicacity Press and PerspicacityPress.com are publications of
Rand Green Communications
P.O. Box 1918 Clovis, California 93613 USA
All contents of this site Copyright 1999-2012 Rand Green Communications,
unless otherwise noted. Authors, artists or photographers whose works are used here by permission retain copyrights to their own works.
Perspicacity Press is a trademark of Rand Green Communications.

This Website Is Powered by TRUTH!